![]() ![]() I am sure there are additional examples which hopefully are added by additional posts. In general 'corresponding author' is a distinction that strongly differentiates author roles, such that some authors are 'workers' and others are 'bosses', with the biggest 'boss' being the corresponding author. This is mostly implied by default in fields where the first authorship means also doing most of the intellectual work. The practice of 'corresponding author' only exists in some scientific fields, while other fields make no such distinction. Manuscript Region of Origin: UNITED KINGDOMAbstract: This paper investigates the interaction between financial innovation and securitization. Sometimes you will see first authors stating they are corresponding author. Corresponding Authors Institution: University of Birmingham First Author: Eliana Lauretta, Ph.D.Order of Authors: Eliana Lauretta, Ph.D. In some fields the most important author is not first, in which case the flag can be used.There may be legal requirements that a specific person should handle correspondence, for example in a company Someone is specifically responsible for a project in which the work for the publication has been made.The first author has done much of the legwork but someone else (a senior scientist) has provided the original idea, funding etc.The first author(s) are not employed at a university or are students Any changes in authorship and Contributorship before and after publication should be agreed by all authors and contributors.I will provide the ones with which I am familiar:įirst, corresponding author means it is the person to contact if you have questions about the research. I am sure it can be used for many meanings. Of course, the person marked as best able to answer question will, mostly likely, be someone who was involved in a wide variety of the research reported in the paper. In lots of other fields, it caries little signal value and really is just used to mark the person who is in the best position to answer questions about the work. In fields where authorship is not simply alphabetic, I've seen the corresponding author designation used to flag the second author as a major contributor because, even in cases of so called "dual-first authorship," somebody's name has to come first. I've seen people go so far as to list corresponding authorship on their CVs when they list their papers although I think this is far from the norm. E.g., a Author A, b Author B, c, Author C. ![]() Thus, in a similar manner, the author information of the lead author can be identified. Use asterisks () to designate co-corresponding authors and numbered. Here the subscripts a, b, and c were used to indicate the affiliation (information) of individual authors. In these cases, the primary contributor is signaled with the corresponding author designation. Include full names of all authors in the order intended for publication. I've seen this in fields like economics where there is a relatively strong norm of listing authors alphabetically. Corresponding authorship is often used to signal the person who is the primary contributor to the work. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |